A parole revocation on a sentence this size is a serious situation and the realistic outlook depends heavily on what caused the violation, the supervising parole officer's recommendation, and ultimately what the parole board decides.
The most optimistic outcomes, a nine-month flop or placement in a therapeutic program like a men's healing center, are typically reserved for people early in a long sentence who have demonstrated genuine progress and whose violation was relatively minor. A flop means being returned to custody for a set period before being re-released on parole. Program placement means completing a structured residential treatment program as an alternative to straight incarceration.
However, on a 13-year sentence where only about two years had been served before the violation, the parole board is likely to view the situation as someone who was released too early without sufficient time to demonstrate sustained change. Boards are protective of their decisions and a violation this early in the sentence gives them reason to be conservative. That generally means more time back inside rather than a minimal sanction.
The specific violation matters enormously. A technical violation like a missed check-in or a failed drug test is treated differently than a new criminal charge. Whatever happened between June 1st and now will be the central factor in how the board responds.
Your instinct that more significant time is likely is probably the more realistic read. Preparing for that outcome while hoping for a better one is the most honest approach to this situation.
Thank you for trying AMP!
You got lucky! We have no ad to show to you!