Nebraska's prison rights landscape in 2024 and 2025 is shaped by a major federal lawsuit that drove concrete reforms before being dismissed, one of the most severely overcrowded state prison systems in the country, a landmark voting rights restoration law, and a significant shift in personal mail delivery to digital systems.
The ACLU of Nebraska's federal civil rights lawsuit Sabata v. Frakes, filed in 2017 and challenging inadequate health care, overuse of solitary confinement, and disability discrimination, was dismissed without prejudice in April 2025. The dismissal cited meaningful progress driven by the litigation, including closure of the Nebraska State Penitentiary's South 40 solitary confinement unit, which a national expert called among the worst in the nation, significantly reduced solitary confinement use, a new state law protecting people with serious mental illness, pregnant people, people with developmental disabilities, traumatic brain injuries, and minors from solitary confinement, and ADA policy changes that took effect in November 2025.
Nebraska's prisons remain at 142 percent of design capacity as of the FY25 Q4 report, making it one of the most overcrowded systems in the country. The Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, known as NDCS, oversees 10 correctional facilities. This guide covers rights inside Nebraska state prisons and county jails across ten domains, grounded in NDCS policy and the current legal landscape.
Here is the short version, before we take each right apart.
Medical and mental health care are constitutionally required; the Sabata v. Frakes lawsuit documented a system in crisis and drove improvements before its April 2025 dismissal. Personal mail for NDCS facilities is now delivered digitally via tablet. Legal mail still goes to the facility. Phone calls run through NDCS contracted systems subject to FCC rate caps. Visitation requires prior approval through NDCS; when a person is released on parole, their visiting list is deleted and must be restarted. Grievances must be filed and exhausted before filing a federal lawsuit. Disciplinary hearings carry due process protections. A new state law protects people with serious mental illness, pregnant people, those with developmental disabilities, traumatic brain injuries, and minors from solitary confinement. PREA protections apply. Religious practice is protected under the First Amendment and RLUIPA. ADA policy changes took effect in November 2025. Nebraska's voting rights restoration law LB 20 passed in 2024 and was upheld by the Nebraska Supreme Court on October 16, 2024, eliminating the two year waiting period after completing a felony sentence.
Overcrowding: Nebraska's prison crisis
Nebraska's prison system has been severely overcrowded for more than a decade. As of the NDCS FY25 Q4 report, the system runs at 142 percent of design capacity, making it one of the most overcrowded in the country. The ACLU of Nebraska described the system as a dangerous system in perpetual crisis when it filed the Sabata v. Frakes lawsuit. Even after years of litigation and reforms, the prison population still exceeds 5,000 people in a system not designed to hold that many.
Overcrowding directly compounds every other rights issue in this guide. When there are not enough staff, medical care falls short of the constitutional floor. When space is scarce, solitary confinement is overused as a management tool. When facilities are packed beyond capacity, programming shrinks, disability accommodations become harder to provide, and violence increases. NDCS is constructing a new multi custody facility in Lincoln as part of the longer term infrastructure response. Until capacity and population align, overcrowding remains the structural force shaping rights inside Nebraska prisons.
Medical and mental health care
Every person in a Nebraska state prison has a constitutional right to adequate medical and mental health care under the Eighth Amendment. The Sabata v. Frakes lawsuit, filed in 2017, documented the scale of the failure: a woman denied cancer treatment for five months; a man who died by suicide after requesting psychiatric care he did not receive; people who deteriorated mentally to the point of self harm while in solitary confinement. When the lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice in April 2025, both sides acknowledged that conditions had improved, but the ACLU reserved the right to refile.
Nebraska's prisons remain at 142 percent of design capacity, which means overcrowding continues to compress available health care resources. If your loved one is not receiving needed medical or mental health care, submit every request in writing with a date, keep copies, and file a formal grievance. Contact the ACLU of Nebraska or Nebraska Appleseed for systemic health care concerns. The April 2025 dismissal was without prejudice, meaning that if conditions deteriorate, litigation can resume.
Mail: digital delivery for personal mail
NDCS personal mail is now delivered digitally. The NDCS mail page states that personal mail to incarcerated individuals is delivered digitally, and families should access current instructions through the NDCS website. This means letters, pictures, and similar personal correspondence are processed through a digital delivery system rather than being physically delivered to the person.
Legal mail, meaning correspondence with courts and licensed attorneys, retains special handling. Legal mail must be opened only in the incarcerated person's presence to check for physical contraband and cannot be read. This constitutional protection applies across all NDCS facilities. InmateAid can help families confirm the current mail procedures, including the digital mail platform and any restrictions specific to the facility where their person is held. Keep copies of all legal mail sent and received.
Phone and video contact
Phone calls from Nebraska state prisons run through the NDCS contracted phone provider, which has included Global Tel Link (GTL) ConnectNetwork. Calls are monitored and recorded except for calls to attorneys. Phone rates are subject to the FCC's prison telephone rate caps, expanded in 2024 to cover all facilities regardless of size.
NDCS offers both in person visitation and virtual visitation. Virtual visiting allows family members and attorneys to connect from a home or office. For virtual visits, visitors must provide their own equipment and internet connection. All visitors 16 and older entering a virtual visiting room must present proper identification. Minors under 16 must have a birth certificate on file with NDCS at the time of the visit. InmateAid can help families set up phone accounts and navigate current virtual visit procedures.
Visitation
Visitation at Nebraska state prisons requires prior approval. The incarcerated person initiates the process by sending a Visitation Request Form to intended visitors. Visitors must read the NDCS visiting policy and the specific visiting procedure for the facility before scheduling. The Reception and Treatment Center (RTC) is currently the only NDCS facility with a body scanner at entry. All visitors must present valid photo identification.
A significant feature of NDCS visitation policy: when an incarcerated person is released on parole, their visiting list is deleted. If that person returns to an NDCS facility on a parole violation, the visiting list must be rebuilt from scratch by sending out new Visitation Request Forms. Minors under 19 must be accompanied by an adult. If a visit is denied or a visitor is removed from an approved list, the incarcerated person may seek review through the NDCS grievance process. County jails in Nebraska operate under separate local authority with their own visiting rules. Contact InmateAid for facility specific visiting information.
The grievance process
Nebraska state prisons maintain an internal grievance process for incarcerated people. NDCS makes its policies publicly available at its policies and rules page, and the grievance policy is among the publicly accessible directives. Grievances must be filed and exhausted through the internal NDCS process before a federal civil rights lawsuit can be filed under the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
The Sabata v. Frakes litigation experience is instructive: individual plaintiffs who filed grievances contributed to a record that supported the entire lawsuit. File every grievance in writing, keep a copy, and document every response and every failure to respond within required timeframes. NDCS also has a Constituent Services function. For systemic concerns, the ACLU of Nebraska and Nebraska Appleseed have both engaged with NDCS and can be contacted after the internal process is complete.
Disciplinary hearings
When a person in Nebraska state custody is accused of a disciplinary infraction, they are entitled to the minimum due process protections from Wolff v. McDonnell: advance written notice of the charge, a hearing, and a written statement of the evidence and reasons for any sanction. NDCS administrative policy governs the disciplinary process at its facilities.
A disciplinary conviction can affect classification, housing assignment, program eligibility, visiting access, and parole consideration before the Nebraska Board of Parole. Document what happened at any disciplinary hearing, who was present, and what evidence was considered. If the hearing result appears to violate procedural requirements, file a grievance and appeal through the NDCS process. Placement in solitary confinement as a disciplinary consequence is now limited by the new state law protecting people with serious mental illness and other vulnerable populations from such placement.
Solitary confinement: reforms driven by litigation
Nebraska's solitary confinement record was at the center of the Sabata v. Frakes lawsuit. During the litigation, the NDCS's South 40 solitary confinement unit at Nebraska State Penitentiary was described by a national expert as among the worst in the nation. NDCS closed the South 40 unit. The average daily population of people in solitary confinement significantly decreased. When the lawsuit was dismissed in April 2025, these were among the changes the ACLU cited as meaningful progress.
Most significantly for future placements, a new state law now diverts from solitary confinement people who have a serious mental illness, are pregnant, have a developmental disability, have a traumatic brain injury, or are a minor. This represents a meaningful statutory protection for some of the most vulnerable populations who are most harmed by isolation. If your loved one falls into any of these categories and is placed in solitary confinement, that placement may violate the new state law. Document the placement and file a grievance immediately.
PREA and protection from sexual abuse
The Prison Rape Elimination Act applies in all NDCS facilities and in Nebraska county jails. Every person in custody has the right to be free from sexual abuse and sexual harassment by staff and by other incarcerated people. NDCS must maintain PREA policies, train staff, provide a reporting mechanism, and protect people who report from retaliation.
NDCS has a Safe Prisons initiative reflected in its mission statement and website, recognizing the importance of protecting incarcerated people from violence. Reports of sexual abuse or harassment can be made to facility staff, the PREA coordinator, or through external reporting options. Retaliation against someone who reports is a PREA violation and the basis of a separate complaint. Document every incident, every report made, and any change in housing or treatment that follows a report.
Religious practice
People incarcerated in Nebraska state prisons have the right to religious practice under the First Amendment and the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. NDCS must accommodate sincere religious beliefs and practices unless it can demonstrate a compelling security interest that cannot be addressed through less restrictive means. Religious programming and chaplaincy services are available in NDCS facilities.
Requests for specific religious accommodations, including dietary adjustments and access to religious items, go through a formal request process at the facility. A denial must rest on a genuine documented security concern. Denials can be challenged through the NDCS grievance process and, if unresolved, in federal court under RLUIPA. Document the specific accommodation requested, the reason given for any denial, and every step taken.
ADA and disability accommodations
People with disabilities in Nebraska state prisons are protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act. The Sabata v. Frakes lawsuit specifically included ADA claims, documenting approximately 750 people with disabilities in NDCS facilities who lacked adequate accommodations for programs and facilities. ADA policy changes took effect in November 2025, improving the request and appeal process, refining systems for identifying disabilities, and establishing more explicit standards. These changes were among the reasons the ACLU agreed to dismiss the lawsuit.
Requests for disability accommodations should be submitted in writing to the facility. A denial or failure to respond can be challenged through the NDCS grievance process and, if unresolved, in federal court. Contact the ACLU of Nebraska or Nebraska Appleseed for systemic disability access concerns. Document every accommodation requested and every response received.
Voting rights: LB 20 and the Nebraska Supreme Court ruling
Nebraska's voting rights restoration for people with felony convictions went through a significant legal battle in 2024. For two decades, Nebraskans had to wait two years after completing their entire felony sentence, including probation and parole, before their voting rights were restored. In April 2024, the Nebraska Legislature passed Legislative Bill 20 (LB 20), which eliminated that two year waiting period. Governor Jim Pillen allowed LB 20 to become law without his signature in April 2024.
Before LB 20 took effect, Attorney General Mike Hilgers issued a nonbinding advisory opinion in July 2024 declaring LB 20 and its predecessor unconstitutional, claiming only the Board of Pardons could restore voting rights. Secretary of State Bob Evnen directed election officials to stop registering people with felony convictions. The ACLU of Nebraska filed a lawsuit. On October 16, 2024, the Nebraska Supreme Court issued an order directing election officials to implement LB 20 immediately. The court held that Hilgers and Evnen had not met the burden of proof required to declare the law unconstitutional. As of October 2024, voting rights in Nebraska are restored upon completing the entire sentence including parole, with no additional waiting period. People convicted of treason remain permanently disenfranchised unless pardoned. As of 2024, approximately 7,000 Nebraskans had their voting rights restored by LB 20.
The bottom line for Nebraska
Nebraska's prison rights landscape is defined by the resolution of the Sabata v. Frakes federal lawsuit with concrete reforms, persistent severe overcrowding at 142 percent of design capacity, the closure of the notorious South 40 solitary confinement unit, new statutory protections limiting who can be placed in solitary, and the October 2024 Nebraska Supreme Court ruling upholding LB 20 and restoring voting rights immediately upon completing a felony sentence.
The rights in this guide are real: adequate medical and mental health care backed by recent litigation driven reforms, digital personal mail delivery, legal mail protection at the facility, phone contact through NDCS contracted systems, visitation through the NDCS approval process with a note that visiting lists are deleted upon parole release, a grievance process under NDCS policy that must be exhausted before federal court, due process in disciplinary hearings, statutory protection from solitary confinement for people with serious mental illness and other vulnerable populations, PREA protections through NDCS Safe Prisons, religious accommodation, ADA policy changes from November 2025, and voting rights restored immediately upon completing all terms of the sentence including parole. Document everything, file every grievance, contact the ACLU of Nebraska for systemic concerns, and stay in contact through InmateAid.
Frequently asked questions
State prison vs. county jail: how do rights differ?
Nebraska state prisons operate under NDCS across 10 facilities, with the Sabata v. Frakes litigation having driven specific reforms including the South 40 closure, solitary confinement reductions, and ADA policy changes. County jails in Nebraska run under county sheriffs with their own visiting rules, grievance procedures, and oversight. Constitutional rights are the same at both levels. People in county jails awaiting trial retain rights that convicted people do not.
What was the Sabata v. Frakes lawsuit?
Sabata v. Frakes was a federal civil rights lawsuit filed by the ACLU of Nebraska in 2017 challenging inadequate health care, overuse of solitary confinement, and disability discrimination in Nebraska's overcrowded prison system. The lawsuit drove concrete reforms: closure of the South 40 solitary unit at Nebraska State Penitentiary, significantly reduced solitary use, a new law protecting vulnerable populations from solitary, and ADA policy changes. The lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice in April 2025, meaning it can be refiled if conditions deteriorate.
Who is protected from solitary confinement in Nebraska?
A new Nebraska state law now prohibits placing people with a serious mental illness, pregnant people, people with a developmental disability, people with a traumatic brain injury, and minors in solitary confinement. These protections were cited as meaningful progress when the ACLU dismissed the Sabata v. Frakes lawsuit in April 2025. NDCS also closed the South 40 unit at Nebraska State Penitentiary and significantly reduced the average daily solitary population before the lawsuit was dismissed.
What are Nebraska felony voting rights after LB 20?
In April 2024, Nebraska passed LB 20, eliminating the two year waiting period after completing a felony sentence. The AG and Secretary of State challenged it, but the Nebraska Supreme Court ordered its implementation on October 16, 2024. As of that ruling, voting rights in Nebraska are restored as soon as a person completes all terms of their felony sentence, including parole. There is no additional waiting period. People convicted of treason remain permanently disenfranchised unless pardoned. Approximately 7,000 Nebraskans had voting rights restored by LB 20.
What happens to my visiting list at parole release?
Under NDCS policy, when a person is released on parole, their visiting list is deleted. If that person returns to an NDCS facility on a parole violation, they must rebuild the visiting list from scratch by initiating a new Visitation Request Form process. Previously approved visitors are not automatically restored. Plan for this possibility and keep records of who was on the approved visiting list.
How does mail work in Nebraska state prisons?
Personal mail for NDCS facilities is now delivered digitally. The NDCS website states that personal mail to incarcerated individuals is delivered digitally. Legal mail, meaning correspondence with courts and licensed attorneys, still goes to the facility and is handled separately. Legal mail can only be opened in the incarcerated person's presence and cannot be read. Families should confirm current digital mail procedures through InmateAid or the NDCS website before sending.
What PREA protections exist in Nebraska prisons?
The Prison Rape Elimination Act applies across all NDCS facilities and Nebraska county jails. NDCS has a Safe Prisons initiative as part of its stated mission. NDCS must maintain PREA policies, train staff, and protect people who report from retaliation. Reports can be made to facility staff, the PREA coordinator, or through external reporting options. Retaliation for reporting is a PREA violation. Document every incident and every change in housing or treatment that follows a report.