Pennsylvania Immigration: State Rules vs. Federal Law - and What to Do Here

This article reflects Pennsylvania law and enforcement conditions as of June 2026. Pennsylvania has no statewide sanctuary law and no statewide mandatory ICE cooperation mandate. Enforcement posture varies sharply by jurisdiction. Key facts: As of April 2026, approximately 78 municipal police departments, county sheriffs, and constables' offices in Pennsylvania held 287(g) agreements with ICE - a more than 70 percent increase from the 45 that had agreements at the end of 2025. Nearly all operate under the Task Force Model, the most expansive type, which authorizes trained officers to conduct immigration enforcement during routine patrol activity including traffic stops. In contrast, Philadelphia signed a seven-bill 'ICE Out' legislative package on May 7, 2026 - codifying sanctuary status, banning ICE use of city property, prohibiting discrimination based on immigration status, banning ICE agent masks in Philadelphia, and restricting city information-sharing with immigration agencies. Philadelphia remains on the federal DOJ's sanctuary jurisdiction list and the House Judiciary Committee sent demand letters to Philadelphia law enforcement officials in May 2026. Pennsylvania State Police operate under an internal policy limiting cooperation with ICE and instructing troopers not to comply with ICE administrative detainers. The federal government purchased two warehouses for potential immigration detention: one in Upper Bern Township, Berks County (capacity approximately 1,500), and one in Tremont Township, Schuylkill County (capacity approximately 7,500). Gov. Josh Shapiro pledged to use all available legal and regulatory authority to block those facilities; as of June 2026 those efforts were ongoing. ICE currently operates the Moshannon Valley Processing Center - a 1,876-bed facility and the largest detention center in the Northeast - in Centre County. Pennsylvania also has active detentions at Cambria County Jail, Clinton County Correctional Facility, Erie County Jail, Franklin County Jail, and Pike County Jail. The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Galarza v. Szalczyk (2014) established that honoring a civil ICE detainer without independent legal authority may create Fourth Amendment liability for local jails in the Third Circuit, which covers Pennsylvania. ICE arrests in Pennsylvania totaled approximately 4,800 in the first three quarters of 2025 - 3.5 times higher than the same period in 2024. Verify current 287(g) agency list and local ordinance status at the Pennsylvania Immigration Coalition (pimmcoalition.org) or HIAS Pennsylvania (hiaspa.org).

Where Pennsylvania Stands

Pennsylvania is one of the most internally divided states in this series. It is a purple state with a Democratic governor, a divided legislature, one of the nation's largest cities with protective local policies, and simultaneously one of the highest concentrations of local 287(g) agreements of any northeastern state. The 78 agencies holding Task Force agreements as of April 2026 represent a more than 70 percent increase from the end of 2025 - growth driven by local sheriffs and police departments acting independently, without any state mandate requiring them to do so.

The defining structural feature of Pennsylvania's story is the absence of a state framework in either direction. Pennsylvania has not enacted a sanctuary ban like New Hampshire or mandatory cooperation law like North Carolina. It also has not enacted a statewide sanctuary law like Oregon or a 287(g) prohibition like New Jersey. The result is a state where a resident in rural McKean County may interact with a Task Force-credentialed local officer, while a resident in Philadelphia is protected by city ordinances codified into law in May 2026. The legal landscape is determined entirely at the local level, within the bounds of federal law and the 3rd Circuit's detainer precedent.

The two proposed federal warehouse detention centers in Berks and Schuylkill counties are the most consequential pending development in Pennsylvania's immigration enforcement picture. The Schuylkill County facility at 7,500 beds would be among the largest immigration detention facilities in the country. Gov. Shapiro has opposed both facilities on infrastructure, environmental, and community impact grounds and pledged to use regulatory and legal authority to block them. As of June 2026, that fight was ongoing. ICE already operates the 1,876-bed Moshannon Valley Processing Center in Centre County, the largest ICE detention facility in the Northeast.

Pennsylvania's immigrant population is large and geographically diverse. Philadelphia's immigrant community represents approximately 16 percent of the city's 1.6 million residents. The Migration Policy Institute estimates approximately 250,000 undocumented immigrants statewide - about 1.5 percent of the total population. Significant immigrant communities exist in the Lehigh Valley (Allentown, Bethlehem, Easton), Reading, Lancaster, York, Erie, Pittsburgh, and communities throughout the agricultural south-central corridor.

Part 1: What Federal Immigration Law Actually Says

Immigration enforcement is exclusively a federal function under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The federal government controls who may enter, remain in, and be removed from the United States. State and local governments cannot create their own immigration enforcement systems that conflict with the INA.

The Tenth Amendment anti-commandeering doctrine, established in Printz v. United States (1997), means the federal government cannot compel state and local agencies to enforce federal immigration law. Pennsylvania's local 287(g) agreements are voluntary. Philadelphia's ICE Out ordinances are an exercise of Home Rule authority to limit city participation in federal enforcement. Neither is compelled by any state law.

ICE detainers, Form I-247, are administrative requests, not court orders. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals, in Galarza v. Szalczyk (2014), held that a local jail may face Fourth Amendment liability for holding someone solely on a civil ICE detainer without independent legal authority. This precedent applies across Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware. Chester County Prison explicitly noted in 2025 that it does not detain people based solely on ICE administrative detainers, citing Galarza. Pennsylvania agencies that hold people solely on civil detainers without judicial authorization face potential civil liability under this binding Third Circuit precedent.

Section 287(g) of the INA creates the voluntary delegation mechanism through which local agencies take on immigration enforcement functions. The Task Force Model - which nearly all of Pennsylvania's 78 agencies use - authorizes trained officers to conduct immigration enforcement during routine patrol, including traffic stops. This is distinct from the Jail Enforcement Model, which restricts enforcement to the jail context. Task Force authority is the broadest form of 287(g) participation.

Arizona v. United States (2012) is the controlling preemption precedent. Philadelphia's ICE Out ordinances, structured as restrictions on city resource use rather than prohibitions on federal enforcement, are designed within the constitutional space that case defined.

Part 2: Pennsylvania State Law and Local Posture

No Statewide Law - In Either Direction

Pennsylvania has no enacted statewide sanctuary law and no statewide mandatory ICE cooperation mandate as of June 2026. The Pennsylvania legislature has members introducing bills in both directions: Sen. Doug Mastriano introduced legislation that would require all Pennsylvania law enforcement agencies to cooperate with ICE and other federal law enforcement; that bill had not passed as of June 2026. No statewide protective legislation had passed either. The result is that every Pennsylvania county, municipality, and law enforcement agency sets its own posture within the bounds of federal law and the Galarza precedent.

Pennsylvania State Police - Limited Cooperation Policy

Pennsylvania State Police operate under an internal policy that limits cooperation with ICE. Under that policy, state troopers are instructed not to comply with ICE administrative detainers - the civil hold requests that are not signed by judges. State police are permitted to 'provide pertinent information' to ICE at their discretion in the course of criminal investigations. State police do not hold Task Force 287(g) agreements as of June 2026. This policy exists at the executive level and could be changed by a future administration. Advocates have called on Gov. Shapiro to strengthen the policy and end ICE access to state databases without judicial warrants.

287(g) Agencies - 78 and Growing

Pennsylvania had approximately 78 local law enforcement agencies holding 287(g) agreements as of April 2026, up from approximately 45 at the end of 2025 - a more than 70 percent increase in roughly four months. Nearly all operate under the Task Force Model. Geographic concentration is heaviest in rural and suburban communities outside the major metros. The Inquirer reported this expansion in April 2026, noting that local law enforcement agencies receive free training from ICE and become eligible for additional federal funding through the program.

The Task Force Model is the most significant type for families to understand. Under it, a trained officer can stop someone during a routine traffic stop or street patrol and conduct immigration enforcement if the officer has reason to believe the person may be in violation of immigration law. This is not limited to jail interactions. Any encounter with a Task Force-credentialed officer in a 287(g) jurisdiction can become an immigration enforcement encounter.

Not all of Pennsylvania's 287(g) agreements are permanent. Bucks County Sheriff Danny Ceisler, elected as a Democrat in 2025, ended the Bucks County Sheriff's Office's 287(g) agreement in January 2026, citing community concerns. He stated Bucks County is not a sanctuary county and its Department of Corrections continues to share data with ICE. The Bucks County example illustrates that locally elected sheriffs retain the authority to enter or exit 287(g) agreements regardless of what prior sheriffs have done. Verify the current list of Pennsylvania 287(g) agencies at ice.gov or the Pennsylvania Immigration Coalition.

Philadelphia - ICE Out Package (Signed May 7, 2026)

Philadelphia City Council passed a seven-bill 'ICE Out' legislative package on April 23, 2026, with a veto-proof majority. Mayor Cherelle Parker signed six of the seven bills on May 7, 2026, and took no action on the seventh - meaning all seven became law. The package represents one of the more comprehensive local immigration enforcement restriction frameworks enacted by any major American city.

The six bills Mayor Parker signed: (1) codification of Philadelphia's sanctuary city status into law - reversing a May 2025 rebranding to 'welcoming city' and formally inscribing non-cooperation principles; (2) prohibition on ICE use of city-owned property for enforcement staging, raids, or operations; (3) prohibition on discrimination based on citizenship or immigration status, via an update to the city's Fair Practices Ordinance; (4) restrictions on city agency information sharing with ICE and federal immigration authorities; (5) additional protections for city employees who decline to assist ICE without judicial authorization; (6) a related ordinance in the package. The seventh bill - banning ICE agents from wearing masks in Philadelphia - became law by default when Parker took no action, though its enforceability against federal agents in a city space is a legal question not yet resolved by courts.

Philadelphia's Office of Immigrant Affairs noted that six of the seven bills were characterized as 'legally problematic' by Mayor Parker's administration before the vote. The mayor signed them anyway after the City Council passed the package with a veto-proof majority. The House Judiciary Committee sent demand letters to Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner, Police Commissioner Kevin Bethel, and Sheriff Rochelle Bilal on May 4, 2026, seeking documents about Philadelphia's immigration enforcement policies and accusing city officials of hindering federal immigration enforcement. Philadelphia remained on the federal DOJ's sanctuary jurisdiction list as of June 2026.

Philadelphia Police under a 2016 executive order and subsequent policy have not complied with ICE administrative detainers for years, accepting only judicial warrants signed by judges. That policy predates the ICE Out package and is now reinforced by codified city law.

Other Pennsylvania Cities and Counties

Beyond Philadelphia, multiple Pennsylvania municipalities enacted local ordinances or resolutions restricting ICE cooperation in 2025-2026. Lancaster enacted an ordinance in 2024 prohibiting data collection on residents' immigration status. Allentown, Reading, Harrisburg, Easton, Narberth, Upper Darby, and Haverford Township each enacted ordinances or resolutions. Allegheny County (Pittsburgh), Bucks County, and Montgomery County all passed resolutions restricting civil immigration enforcement cooperation on county property or limiting information sharing. Pittsburgh has maintained a policy limiting police cooperation with ICE civil enforcement.

These local measures vary in legal form, scope, and enforceability. A county resolution is different from a codified city ordinance. A statement of policy is different from an enacted law. Families in Pennsylvania should verify the specific posture of their municipality and county rather than assuming uniform protection.

The Proposed Warehouse Detention Centers - Berks and Schuylkill Counties

In early 2026, it became public that the federal government had purchased two warehouses for potential conversion to immigration detention facilities. One warehouse is in Upper Bern Township, Berks County, with a proposed capacity of approximately 1,500. The other is in Tremont Township, Schuylkill County, with a proposed capacity of approximately 7,500 - which would make it one of the largest immigration detention facilities in the country. ICE purchased these properties without prior consultation with state or local officials, according to Gov. Shapiro.

Gov. Shapiro met with county officials from both Berks and Schuylkill counties on February 26, 2026, and stated he would use all available legal and regulatory authority to block the facilities. In a February 12, 2026 letter to DHS Secretary Noem, Shapiro said the state would not issue necessary permits for the facilities. He cited infrastructure concerns: the Tremont facility's water system serves approximately 700 homes and would need to triple its capacity to serve the proposed facility. Environmental groups filed legal action. As of June 2026, no court had ruled in the state's favor on blocking the facilities, and the ICE permitting dispute was ongoing. These are the most consequential pending developments for Pennsylvania's detention landscape. Monitor status at the Pennsylvania Capital-Star or through Gov. Shapiro's office.

Moshannon Valley Processing Center - Active Detention

ICE currently operates the Moshannon Valley Processing Center in Centre County, Pennsylvania. With approximately 1,876 beds, it is the largest immigration detention facility in the Northeast. Families of people detained in Pennsylvania may find their family member held at Moshannon Valley or at one of several county jails with ICE bed-space arrangements: Cambria County Jail, Clinton County Correctional Facility, Erie County Jail, Franklin County Jail, and Pike County Jail. Locating detained family members quickly is critical, as transfers between facilities can occur.

Part 3: How State and Federal Law Interact in Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania's enforcement picture is shaped primarily by local choices within a federal framework that places no state-level mandate in either direction. The 3rd Circuit's Galarza decision (2014) is the most legally significant Pennsylvania-specific constraint: it holds that jails in the Third Circuit may face Fourth Amendment liability for holding someone solely on a civil ICE detainer without independent legal authority. This creates a legal disincentive for Pennsylvania jails to honor civil detainers even where no local policy prohibits it.

Philadelphia's ICE Out ordinances operate on Home Rule authority. Whether specific provisions - the mask ban on federal agents, the prohibition on federal use of city property - are enforceable against federal officers is a legal question that courts in the Third Circuit have not fully resolved. The federal government has challenged similar provisions in other jurisdictions. Philadelphia's history includes a 2018 court victory against the first Trump administration over ICE database access. The current ordinances extend further and may face legal challenge.

The proposed warehouse detention centers test a different legal question: whether a state governor's regulatory and permitting authority can effectively block a federal detention facility from opening. The federal government argues that immigration detention is a federal function that states cannot obstruct through state permitting requirements. Pennsylvania argues that the facilities require state and local permits for construction, environmental compliance, and utility services that it can legitimately withhold. This is unresolved litigation as of June 2026.

Federal enforcement operates throughout Pennsylvania independent of local policies. ICE's Philadelphia Field Office covers Pennsylvania and Delaware. Task Force 287(g) officers in 78 agencies supplement that capacity. Federal enforcement does not depend on city or county cooperation in jurisdictions like Philadelphia that have protective ordinances.

Part 4: What This Means for Families on the Ground

For families in Pennsylvania, geographic location is the single most important factor in assessing enforcement risk at the local level. The variation between a Task Force 287(g) jurisdiction and Philadelphia is as wide as the variation between two different states in this series.

In Philadelphia, city police will not ask about immigration status, will not hold people on civil ICE detainers, and will not assist ICE without a judicial warrant under the May 2026 ICE Out laws. This is now codified city law, not merely executive policy. Note that Philadelphia Sheriff and courts have separate policies, and federal enforcement operates in public spaces regardless of city law.

In the approximately 78 jurisdictions with Task Force 287(g) agreements - many in rural and suburban Pennsylvania - a routine traffic stop can become an immigration enforcement encounter. Any encounter with a 287(g)-credentialed officer in those jurisdictions carries that risk. Verify whether your local police department or county sheriff holds a Task Force agreement before any law enforcement contact.

Pennsylvania State Police do not hold 287(g) agreements and follow an internal policy against civil detainer compliance. A traffic stop by a state trooper on an interstate or state highway does not carry the same immigration enforcement risk as one in a 287(g) county - but that policy can change and families should verify current status.

The Moshannon Valley Processing Center in Centre County is active and holds approximately 1,876 people. Transfer to Moshannon Valley or to county jails with ICE arrangements can happen quickly after any detention. The proposed Berks and Schuylkill County facilities, if they open, would significantly increase detention capacity in the state.

ICE arrests in Pennsylvania totaled approximately 4,800 in the first three quarters of 2025. A Pennsylvania Capital-Star analysis found that approximately 40 percent of those arrested in that period had no criminal histories - a figure the federal government disputes. Federal enforcement operates statewide and is not limited to jurisdictions with formal 287(g) agreements.

Part 5: What You Can Actually Do

If ICE Comes to Your Home

Do not open the door. ICE cannot legally enter a home without a judicial warrant signed by a judge. An administrative warrant, Form I-200 or I-205, is signed by an immigration officer, not a judge, and does not authorize home entry. Ask through the closed door: 'Is this warrant signed by a judge?' If not, say clearly that you do not consent to entry.

You have the right to remain silent. Say: 'I am exercising my right to remain silent. I want to speak with a lawyer.' Do not answer questions about your birthplace, how you entered the country, or your immigration status. Do not sign anything without speaking with an attorney.

During a Traffic Stop

Provide your driver's license, registration, and proof of insurance. Pennsylvania does not have a standard driver's license available regardless of immigration status - Pennsylvania licenses require legal presence. If you are stopped by an officer in a Task Force 287(g) jurisdiction, that officer has authority to make immigration inquiries. You have the right to remain silent on immigration matters beyond producing required driving documents. Say: 'I am exercising my right to remain silent on immigration matters.'

If you are stopped by Pennsylvania State Police, their internal policy instructs troopers not to comply with civil ICE detainers - but that policy does not prevent troopers from calling ICE if they develop reason to believe you are in violation of immigration law through a criminal investigation.

If a Family Member Is Detained

Use the ICE Online Detainee Locator at locator.ice.gov immediately. Family members in Pennsylvania may be held at Moshannon Valley Processing Center (Centre County), or at county jails in Cambria, Clinton, Erie, Franklin, or Pike counties, or transferred to other states.

Call the ICE Detention Reporting and Information Line: 1-888-351-4024.

Call the EOIR Immigration Court Information Line: 1-800-898-7180.

Contact HIAS Pennsylvania: hiaspa.org. HIAS Pennsylvania provides immigration legal services across the state.

Contact the Pennsylvania Immigration Coalition: pimmcoalition.org. The PIC coordinates statewide immigrant advocacy and tracks local ordinances and 287(g) agreements.

Contact JUNTOS: juntoscs.org. JUNTOS serves immigrant communities in Philadelphia and surrounding areas with organizing and rapid response.

Contact Nationalities Service Center (NSC): nscphiladelphia.org. NSC provides direct immigration legal services in Philadelphia.

Know the Risk Points in Pennsylvania

Approximately 78 local agencies hold Task Force 287(g) agreements as of April 2026 - the most expansive type. Any routine encounter with those agencies can become an immigration enforcement encounter. Verify whether your local police or county sheriff holds an agreement.

Philadelphia's ICE Out package is now law as of May 2026. City police will not assist ICE civil enforcement and will not honor administrative detainers. Federal enforcement in public spaces continues regardless.

Pennsylvania State Police have an internal anti-detainer policy but no formal 287(g) agreements. State police encounters carry lower immigration enforcement risk than Task Force county encounters - but policy can change.

Moshannon Valley Processing Center in Centre County is Pennsylvania's largest active ICE detention facility at 1,876 beds. Transfers to Moshannon Valley happen quickly.

Two proposed warehouse detention centers in Berks and Schuylkill counties are opposed by Gov. Shapiro and under legal challenge. If opened, they would dramatically expand Pennsylvania's detention capacity. Monitor status through the Pennsylvania Capital-Star.

Part 6: Legal Resources in Pennsylvania

HIAS Pennsylvania: hiaspa.org. Immigration legal services statewide.

Pennsylvania Immigration Coalition (PIC): pimmcoalition.org. Statewide advocacy, tracks local ordinances and 287(g) agreements.

Nationalities Service Center (NSC): nscphiladelphia.org. Immigration legal services in Philadelphia.

JUNTOS: juntoscs.org. Immigrant organizing and rapid response in Philadelphia and surrounding counties.

Community Legal Services Philadelphia: clsphila.org. Free legal services for low-income Philadelphians including immigration.

Pennsylvania Legal Aid Network: palawhelp.org. Connects people to free legal aid statewide.

Make the Road Pennsylvania: maketheroadpa.org. Immigrant organizing and services in the Lehigh Valley and beyond.

Casa San Jose (Pittsburgh): casasanjose.org. Serves immigrant communities in western Pennsylvania.

Immigration Advocates Network: immigrationadvocates.org.

EOIR Immigration Court Information Line: 1-800-898-7180.

ICE Detainee Locator: locator.ice.gov.

ICE Detention Reporting and Information Line: 1-888-351-4024.

Summary

Pennsylvania has no statewide sanctuary law and no statewide mandatory ICE cooperation mandate. Enforcement posture is determined entirely at the local level. As of April 2026, approximately 78 local agencies hold Task Force 287(g) agreements - a more than 70 percent increase from the end of 2025 - with nearly all using the Task Force Model that authorizes immigration enforcement during routine patrol. Philadelphia signed a seven-bill ICE Out package on May 7, 2026, codifying sanctuary status, banning ICE use of city property, restricting information sharing, and prohibiting discrimination based on immigration status. Pennsylvania State Police have an internal anti-detainer policy but no formal 287(g) agreements. The 3rd Circuit's Galarza v. Szalczyk (2014) decision creates Fourth Amendment liability exposure for Pennsylvania jails that hold people solely on civil ICE detainers without independent legal authority.

The federal government purchased two Pennsylvania warehouses for potential immigration detention in Berks County (capacity 1,500) and Schuylkill County (capacity 7,500). Gov. Shapiro has pledged to use all regulatory and legal authority to block those facilities; that effort was ongoing as of June 2026. ICE already operates the Moshannon Valley Processing Center, the Northeast's largest detention facility at 1,876 beds. ICE arrested approximately 4,800 Pennsylvania residents in the first three quarters of 2025. For families, enforcement risk varies dramatically by location. Know whether your local law enforcement holds a 287(g) agreement, know your rights at any police encounter, and contact HIAS Pennsylvania or the Pennsylvania Immigration Coalition for current guidance.

Sources and verification: Philadelphia Inquirer, 'More Pennsylvania Police Agencies Are Signing Up to Help ICE Enforce Immigration Laws,' April 15, 2026 (78 agencies as of April 2026; 70% increase from 45 at end of 2025; Task Force Model dominant); WHYY News, 'Philadelphia City Council Passes ICE Out Legislation,' April 23, 2026; Philadelphia Inquirer, 'Mayor Parker Signs Sweeping Restrictions on Immigration Enforcement,' May 7, 2026 (six bills signed, seventh became law by inaction); WHYY News, 'Philadelphia's ICE Out Legislation: What to Know,' April 15-24, 2026; WHYY News, 'ICE Operations, Agreements in the Philadelphia Region: What to Know,' March 12, 2026 (Bucks County Sheriff Ceisler ends 287(g) January 2026; Chester County Galarza policy; Montgomery County resolution; Pennsylvania State Police internal anti-detainer policy; Moshannon Valley 1,876 beds; county jails Cambria, Clinton, Erie, Franklin, Pike); Pennsylvania Capital-Star, 'Cities and Counties Across Pennsylvania Are Passing Legislation for When ICE Comes to Town,' March 17, 2026 (4,800 arrests first three quarters 2025; 40% no criminal histories per Capital-Star analysis; Lancaster 2024 ordinance; Harrisburg February 2026 process); Pennsylvania Capital-Star, 'Gov. Shapiro Promises to Fight Proposed ICE Detention Centers in Pennsylvania,' February 27, 2026; Philadelphia Inquirer, 'An Angry Josh Shapiro Pledges to Block New ICE Detention Centers in Pa.,' February 26, 2026 (Berks County 1,500-bed facility; Schuylkill County 7,500-bed facility; Shapiro February 12 letter to Noem; Tremont water system issues); Center Square, 'Bill Requiring Local Support for ICE Introduced in Senate,' January 20, 2026 (Mastriano mandatory cooperation bill; 51 agencies with 287(g) agreements as of that date); City and State Pennsylvania, 'Philadelphia City Council Passes ICE Out Legislation Out of Committee,' April 14, 2026 (Parker May 2025 welcoming city rebranding; city solicitor legally problematic characterizations); House Judiciary Committee demand letters to Krasner, Bethel, Bilal, May 4, 2026; Metro Philadelphia, 'Philadelphia's Long-Standing Sanctuary Movement Faces New Challenges,' April 12, 2026 (16% of Philadelphia residents immigrants; 250,000 undocumented statewide estimate); Galarza v. Szalczyk, 745 F.3d 634 (3d Cir. 2014) (civil detainer Fourth Amendment liability); Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012); Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997). Volatile items requiring verification: Current Pennsylvania 287(g) agency count (78 as of April 2026; growing; verify at ice.gov); Berks and Schuylkill County warehouse detention center status (opposed by Gov. Shapiro; litigation pending as of June 2026); Philadelphia ICE Out ordinances - any federal legal challenge; Mastriano mandatory cooperation bill status (circulating, not passed as of June 2026); Pennsylvania State Police internal policy current version. Last verified: June 2026.