There are two separate issues here and they work through different channels for different reasons.
On the dormitory placement question, the logic behind the request may not apply the way it seems from the outside. Dormitories and cells are not interchangeable housing options within the same facility. They represent entirely different security classifications. Dormitory housing is reserved for minimum security inmates who have short sentences, clean disciplinary records, and no history of violence in their background. Inmates living in cells are classified at a higher custody level, whether low, medium, or high security, and that classification is what separates them from dorm-eligible inmates, regardless of how long they have been in the system.
When other inmates appear to have less time but are placed in dorms, there are almost certainly other eligibility factors at work that are not visible from the outside. Offense type, criminal history, violence indicators, and custody scoring all feed into the classification that determines dorm eligibility. Time served is one factor among many rather than the deciding one.
On the cellmate conflict and racial harassment, this is the more actionable issue right now. The right move is to go directly to the counselor or case manager and request a cell reassignment. Not feeling safe is a valid reason to make the request but it carries more weight when it is documented specifically. Writing down what was said, when it happened, and submitting it formally as a grievance creates a record that staff are required to respond to. A verbal complaint about not feeling comfortable is easier to dismiss than a written grievance documenting specific racial comments.
Requesting a different cell within the same unit is a realistic and appropriate ask. Requesting a move to minimum security dormitory housing is a classification change that requires meeting criteria that may not currently be met.
Thank you for trying AMP!
You got lucky! We have no ad to show to you!