No. That door closes the second time around.
When someone finals their number, meaning they serve out their sentence completely with no parole supervision remaining, and then reoffends, the system treats it differently than a parole violation but the outcome is arguably harsher in one specific way. There is no parole board consideration this time. He will be required to serve 85 percent of whatever sentence the judge hands down before any release is possible.
The reasoning from the system's perspective is straightforward. Parole is extended as an act of trust, an acknowledgment that the person can reintegrate under supervision before their full sentence is complete. A repeat offender who already completed a full sentence and still came back has demonstrated that the rehabilitative assumption does not apply. The response is to remove the discretionary release mechanism entirely and replace it with a mandatory percentage.
At 85 percent, the math is unforgiving. A five-year sentence means a minimum of four years and three months served before release is even a conversation. A ten-year sentence means eight and a half years. There is no parole hearing to prepare for, no board to impress, no early release based on good behavior beyond what little good time credit the facility allows within that 85 percent floor.
The only things that influence the outcome at this point are the sentence the judge imposes and how he conducts himself inside. A clean institutional record will not get him out earlier than 85 percent, but it will make the time more manageable and position him better for whatever comes after.