A conviction is not always the end of the legal road. Post-conviction appeals offer pathways to challenge a verdict, a sentence, or the conditions of a conviction on specific legal grounds. The most common federal post-conviction remedy is the 2255 motion which challenges a conviction based on ineffective assistance of counsel or constitutional violations. State systems have their own equivalent processes. This section covers what post-conviction appeals are available, what legal standards must be met to succeed, how long the process takes, what the difference is between a direct appeal and a collateral attack, and what realistic expectations look like given the high bar courts apply to post-conviction claims. The guidance here is honest about the difficulty of these processes while explaining exactly what options exist and what they require. An experienced post-conviction attorney is essential for any serious appeal effort. See also our sections on Law Questions and Legal Terms, Clemency and Pardons, and Sentence Reduction.
Subject: Post conviction appeals
The short answer is that a traditional appeal is almost certainly not available at this point, but there are other avenues worth understanding.
Direct appeals in the federal system, which is where bank robbery cases almost always land since robbing a federally insured bank is a federal crime, have strict filing deadlines. A direct appeal has to be filed within 14 days of sentencing. A motion to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence under 28 USC Section 2255 has a...
Read moreSubject: Post conviction appeals
The follow up for an appellate remand is normally a few weeks to 3-4 months. It depends on the prosecutor's office to set the pace based on their caseload.
Subject: Post conviction appeals
A Brady violation is one of the stronger grounds for appeal that exists in criminal law, but strong does not mean automatic, and the road from violation to overturn is long and difficult.
Brady v. Maryland is the 1963 Supreme Court decision that requires prosecutors to disclose any evidence that is favorable to the defendant and material to guilt or sentencing. That includes exculpatory evidence that could prove innocence and impeachment evidence that could undermine the credibility of witnesses. When the...
Read moreSubject: Post conviction appeals
When a court appoints an appellate attorney, that appointment comes through the Public Defender's office. The inmate does not get to choose who is assigned, the court makes that determination and the Public Defender's office handles the assignment from there.
Finding out who was appointed is usually straightforward. The inmate can ask their case manager or counselor at the facility, who can help them contact the court clerk's office for the jurisdiction where the appeal is being filed. The clerk's office...
Read moreSubject: Post conviction appeals
This is the kind of situation where appellate and post-conviction options need to be explored thoroughly, and they should be with the help of a qualified attorney who handles this area of law.
On challenging the conviction itself: if there were errors during the trial, whether in how evidence was admitted, how the jury was instructed, how witnesses were used, or how the prosecution handled the case, those errors can form the basis of a direct appeal. A direct appeal must...
Read moreSubject: Post conviction appeals
Sixteen years is a significant amount of time, and the frustration behind this question is understandable. But a realistic answer requires honesty about how difficult this path is.
A 35-year sentence for multiple robbery convictions reflects a criminal history the court viewed as serious and repeated. Sentences of that length are not revisited simply because time has passed or because the sentence feels disproportionate to the family. Courts operate on the record that existed at the time of sentencing, and absent...
Read more